WHO WE SERVE

Care that fits patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

Care that fits patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

Care that fits patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

EasyLink runs RPM and CCM so clinics enroll; we operate — patients stay at home, hospitals see fewer surprise acute events, and charts stay in Athenahealth, eCW, and Veradigm.

EasyLink runs RPM and CCM so clinics enroll; we operate — patients stay at home, hospitals see fewer surprise acute events, and charts stay in Athenahealth, eCW, and Veradigm.

Patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

Patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

Patients, hospitals, and the EMR you already use

EasyLink is the operations layer: clinics enroll, we run RPM and CCM, and each audience gets what they need without a new portal for physicians.

Patients

Patients take readings at home on cellular devices and open a mobile app with their phone number and a one-time code — no web login. Coordinators call when a reading is missing, so the clinic is not the help desk.

Cellular home devices, no Wi-Fi hunt

Phone + OTP mobile app — no web login

Coordinators who call, not a portal to check

Hospitals

Health systems get visibility between visits, not only at the next appointment. On routine coordinator check-ins, 324 acute-care events were surfaced — 126 hospital admissions and 198 ER or urgent-care visits, self-reported by patients.

Between-visit visibility on the panel

324 acute-care events on routine check-ins

Admissions and ER reported before the next visit

EMR

EasyLink syncs natively with Athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, and Veradigm so physicians stay in the chart they already use. No second inbox and no second login for clinical review.

Athenahealth, eCW, and Veradigm

Physicians stay in their chart

See the EMR integration page →

What the last eight months looked like

What the last eight months looked like

What the last eight months looked like

Coordinator check-in surveys from January 1 to August 31, 2024. These are patient-reported answers on a subset of sessions — not a claims extract, and not a reduction claim.

324

324

324

Acute-care events surfaced between visits

126 hospital admissions + 198 ER/urgent care, self-reported on coordinator surveys.

70,566

Monitored care sessions

Eight-month program volume. Check-ins attach to a subset of these sessions, not every contact.

4,820

Documented check-ins

6.8% of sessions. The survey rides with specific session types — not a census of every touch.

Two charts, two scales — sessions and check-ins are never plotted on one axis.

Monitored care sessions

70,566

Scale: 70,566 = full track

Documented check-ins

4,820

Scale: 4,820 = full track (not 6.8% of the bar above)

How those 4,820 check-ins split

Hospital overnight stay

Yes 126 (2.64%)

No 4,642

ER or urgent care

Yes 198 (4.13%)

No 4,601

Methodology: January 1 – August 31, 2024. Check-ins are 6.8% of sessions because the survey attaches to a subset of session types — not every contact. Answers are patient-reported on coordinator calls, not claims data. There is no comparison group; we do not claim a percentage reduction in ER visits.

Questions clinics ask

Questions clinics ask

Questions clinics ask

Who the patient talks to, what physicians see, which EMRs we sync, and how the 324 figure is counted.

Who does the patient talk to?

Do physicians get a new inbox?

Which EMRs do you connect to?

How is the 324 figure counted?

See how this looks for your panel

See how this looks for your panel

See how this looks for your panel

Walk through enrollment, coordinator coverage, and EMR sync for the patients you already see.